Skip to content
Range Compare

Side by side · Facts only

Conducttr beside Cytactic: training types and facts side by side

Short answer

Conducttr sells tabletop and crisis simulation; Cytactic sells tabletop and crisis simulation. They differ on 0 of 4 training types and 4 of 8 checks on the pages we read. This page sets their published facts side by side; it does not pick one.

By The Range Desk · Cyber Range Compare · Published 2026-10-11 · Updated 2026-10-13

Desk research from public vendor, standards and regulator pages read on 27 September, 11 October and 13 October 2026. Profiles follow our published method; we did not run the products.

Which training types does each sell?

Conducttr lanes: sells 1 of 4 training types; not in our sources for 3. Compared with Cytactic lanes: sells 1 of 4 training types; not in our sources for 3.Not foundRANGELive fireNot foundLABSSolo skillsSoldCRISISDecisionsNot foundAWAREEvery employee
  • Targets: Conducttr
  • Diamonds: Cytactic
  • RANGE · Cyber range: Not in our sources; Cytactic: Not in our sources
  • LABS · Hands-on lab libraries: Not in our sources; Cytactic: Not in our sources
  • CRISIS · Tabletop and crisis simulation: Sold; Cytactic: Sold
  • AWARE · Awareness training: Not in our sources; Cytactic: Not in our sources
The lanes show what each platform's own pages describe, or how your answers weigh the four training types. They do not measure how well a product works.
  • Filled target: the platform sells this training type on the pages we read
  • Hatched target: sold with a condition (an add-on, an adjacent product, or part of the type)
  • Dashed target: not in our sources (it may exist; we did not find it)
From each platform's own pages, read 27 September or 11 October 2026.
TypeConducttrCytactic
Cyber rangeNot in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Not in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Hands-on lab librariesNot in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Not in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Tabletop and crisis simulationSold

Virtual Desktop, Scenario Editor and Conducttr Worlds; exercises run virtual, in person or hybrid, from one team to 1,000+ simultaneous teams.

Source: Conducttr homepage · Read 27 Sep 2026

Sold

"Risk-tuned, Realistic Crisis Simulation (Digital TTX)", with a Simulation Generator: five ready-made simulations plus an AI engine that builds new ones.

Source: Cytactic blog: the next generation of cyber tabletops · Read 13 Oct 2026

Awareness trainingNot in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Not in our sources

Not described on the pages we read.

Where do their published facts differ?

  • Executives and non-technical roles take part: Conducttr Matches, Cytactic Partly

    Conducttr: Built for crisis teams, with role-specific content for the players and exercises in person, online or hybrid.

    Cytactic: Generated exercises include stakeholder discussions, with crisis communication and legal disclosure agents in the platform; an exercise format for executives or the board is not described.

  • Built around your own environment or tools: Conducttr Not in our sources, Cytactic Partly

    Conducttr: Not in our sources.

    Cytactic: Scenarios are built from the organisation's profile and data.

  • Reports or evidence for auditors, boards or regulators: Conducttr Partly, Cytactic Matches

    Conducttr: Real-time analytics and central reporting; the Assessment Toolkit is priced separately, from £4,536 a year.

    Cytactic: Post-simulation reports and "regulator-ready records" are stated.

  • Price published: Conducttr Matches, Cytactic Not in our sources

    Conducttr: Four licences published: Raven £11,950, Hawk £16,465, Osprey £21,000 and Eagle £25,725 a year, each for up to 40 participants per session, in GBP excluding tax.

    Cytactic: Not in our sources.

Where do they match?

  • Sold Tabletop and crisis simulation

Neither platform's pages describe: Cyber range, Hands-on lab libraries, Awareness training, Hands-on keyboard work, Free start (free tier, trial or free material), Sessions of an hour or less, Reaches the whole workforce.

What do they cost?

Conducttr

Raven £11,950, Hawk £16,465, Osprey £21,000 and Eagle £25,725 a year, each for up to 40 participants per session, GBP excluding tax. Assessment Toolkit from £4,536 a year. Larger exercises and Conducttr Local are priced on request.

Source: Conducttr pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026

Cytactic

Not published; the route in is a demo.

Source: Cytactic homepage · Read 13 Oct 2026

How do their strengths and limits compare?

Conducttr

Strengths

  • The only full public price list in this set: four licences from £11,950 to £25,725 a year.
  • Simulates the information environment around the players: news, social media and messaging.
  • Scales from one team to 1,000+ simultaneous teams, in person, online or hybrid.

Limits

  • You design and run the exercise yourself in the Scenario Editor, which is closer to exercise design than to a ready-made scenario.
  • No technical hands-on training, and the template library is general crisis content rather than cyber-specific.

Cytactic

Strengths

  • A ready library of five crisis simulations plus a generator that drafts new ones from the organisation's profile.
  • Simulation artefacts such as ransom notes, breaking news and system data appear automatically.
  • Sits next to playbooks, crisis communication and legal disclosure tools.

Limits

  • Not a lab platform or a cyber range: no hands-on technical environment is described.
  • No published price, and board formats and measurement are not described on the pages we read.

Which one fits which team?

Look at Conducttr if you want to design your own crisis exercises and see the price before a call, or if your exercise needs simulated press and social media pressure. Look at Cytactic if you want tabletop practice next to your playbooks and disclosure tools, or if you want ready-made crisis scenarios to start from.

Not sure which training type you need first? The training type finder weighs your answers before it lists platforms.

Questions people ask

Is Conducttr or Cytactic cheaper?

Conducttr publishes a price: Raven £11,950, Hawk £16,465, Osprey £21,000 and Eagle £25,725 a year, each for up to 40 participants per session, GBP excluding tax. Assessment Toolkit from £4,536 a year. Larger exercises and Conducttr Local are priced on request. Cytactic does not publish a price on the pages we read.

Do Conducttr and Cytactic sell the same kind of training?

They both sell tabletop and crisis simulation.

Can I compare several platforms at once?

Yes. The platform fact grid puts up to twelve side by side, and you can pick which ones.

  • Conducttr profile

    A crisis exercise platform for building and running your own exercises, which simulates news, social media and messaging around the players.

  • Cytactic profile

    A cyber incident response management hub with a simulation generator: five ready-made crisis simulations and an AI engine that builds new ones from the organisation's profile, run in a Simulation Mode inside the platform.

  • Tabletop and crisis simulation

    The people who own decisions in an incident work through a scenario and decide what to do, from a scripted discussion to an adaptive simulation.

  • Platform fact grid

    Every platform's facts in one table.